Monday, April 16, 2012

REPLIES+MORE FOR GOOGLE PLUS

Great extension! and the creator is really great about updating and continuing to make additions to make it even better. Def worth an add and a "donate" of a cup of coffee to keep the guy awake and going....come on now guys you need him awake to keep improving the extensions you want, even if it's for your own self preservation....JUST DO IT!




REPLIES+MORE LINK TO CHROME WEB STORE

Tuesday, April 10, 2012

Review of the Review Reviewed by Reviewer is Wrong but is it ever Right?

Firstly i'll quickly give you my take on the title, I bring the whole issue up because of the issue google experienced in the article I posted link to which talked about bloggers being hired to write posts about the google chrome and some linked back to the chrome download page which violates the terms of google's own agreement depending on your interpretation.  Back to why I felt the need to post my own little disclaimer......


Basically, in my opinion, as morally driven, honest, trustworthy, and someone who truly is a man of their word, in some way or another your going to be biased one way or another if your being monetarily compensated. The good ol quid pro quo. The backroom deals, simple handshake or the old fashioned "greasing of the palm". (that one has a different connotation nowadays so you probably want to skip using it if your talking to my generation. Whether your just omitting a bug that you noticed and only occurred that one time 2 months ago or your making a completely false statement when you review a product as excellent and go on to explain how great each aspect was, your not giving a fair assessment to your readers. When you have users that are spending their time by reading your blog post, newspaper article, magazine etc because they value your opinion, need advice, looking to make comparisons between 2 different brands or whatever. 


Coming from someone that writes a blog and hopes someday to even have half the viewership that many of other blogs you get initially directed to when you search keywords I find it disgusting and really question not only their moral integrity but it leaves me wondering where else they have no problem compromising their morals. 


My point in all of this is that I put a lot of effort into picking and choosing the topics and articles I write about for my blogs because I have a responsibility to my readers to give them the best of what I have. Now saying that, everyone shares differing opinions, that's what makes us who we are. Just because we don't agree on a topic doesn't mean that I don't want you reading or commenting anymore and I hope you don't want to stop reading or posting because we are on different sides of the fence on something. I want this to be a forum for anyone and everyone who is looking for an opinion or review of something. We all don't have to agree, the only rule that I ask everyone to follow is to all be respectful whether it's agreeing or disagreeing.


Lastly, and I want to make this 100% crystal clear.....I HAVE NOT, AM NOT AND WILL NOT EVER ACCEPT COMPENSATION FOR MY OPINION ONE WAY OR ANOTHER ON A PRODUCT, STORE, BRAND, WEBSITE OR WHATEVER ELSE. If someone would like me to review their new site they created i'm always more then happy to do that.....but be aware, you are going to get an honest accessment of your site and items, the sword cuts both ways. Feel free to ask my opinion off the record and i'll check it out and just email you back myself, I don't mind at all. 


http://techcrunch.com/2012/01/03/google-paid-link/

Sunday, March 4, 2012

If you owned a business would you rather inform all your customers that you accidently rewarded them too much so your taking it back or just build some positive brand equity with them and come out looking like your a stand up company???

For me the deciding factor would have to be exactly how much monetary value was actually being credited whether it be cash, points for gift certificates, prize raffles or gift cards along with exactly how many customers were credited too much in the first place.

I bring all of this up because this situation occured to me, I haden't even noticed that my account had been credited with an extra 0 to my reward after I completed a survey. Instad of being 110 it was 1100. I checked out what the value of points would be in relation to gift certificates and it's about $2.50 that MYVIEW had incorrectly paid their "employees". By employees I mean unemployed, bored, retired, possibly desperate, broke, or sometimes its just someone who has extra time on their hands and are on the computer basically all day anyways, ppl like me who were answering their surveys online.

Now, I have no idea how many participants/employees they have filling out surveys in total or how many of those said employees actually fillled out THIS survey so obviously I have no idea whether they would have sustained a loss of $10 million or $100 but if I had to guess I think it'd be a pretty safe bet to say that it's somewhere in the middle. I myself think its probably on the lower end and would have thought the users they alienated would outweigh those losses but they took the opposite stance.

Although I received an apologetic letter it certainty didn't make up for My View's policy of "Indian Giving" to take a term from my childhood.  Even if they did something along the lines of give 220 points instead of the 110/1100 then that would have shown they understand THEY made a mistake and still want their users to feel appreciated but to just take back 990 points with an "i'm sorry" does not cut it. If the grocery store had given me change for $10 instead of $1 would they email me and ask to come in because they are taking my money back???

All in all it just seeems like TERRIBLE BUSINESS POLICY TO ME, WHAT DO YOU GUYS THINK?